ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Archives of Disease in Childhood 2006;91:542
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, M
Right arrow Articles by Renfrew, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, M
Right arrow Articles by Renfrew, M

LETTER

Tongue ties and breast feeding

M Griffiths1

1 Southampton General Hospital, UK; mervyn.griffiths@suht.swest.nhs.uk

Keywords: tongue tie; breast feeding

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The humble tongue tie, like the foreskin, generates enormous quantities of hot air, with little evidence to support it. I welcome the decision by the Archives of Disease in Childhood to commission a Perspective on tongue tie1 in the same month that NICE2 has issued its positive guidance on the same topic.

Hall and Renfrew begin by stating their bias. Mine is that the Archives of Disease in Childhood rejected my two articles on tongue tie, a prospective series and a randomised control trial,3,4 both now published by other peer reviewed journals, but which the Archives of Disease in Childhood rejected following very poor quality "peer review", and compounded the error by referring me to my Medical Director as someone who was performing procedures which were unethical. This charge was rejected by my Trust.

The interesting question here is how to persuade an intelligent, professional body (in this case, paediatricians), . . . [Full text of this article]

D Hall2, M Renfrew2

2 Institute of General Practice and Primary Care, Community Sciences Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK; d.hall@sheffield.ac.uk




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
P M Dunn
Tongue-tie and infant feeding.
Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2006; 91(12): 1042 - 1042.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Tongue-tie and Infant Feeding
Peter Dunn
ADC Online, 12 Jun 2006 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health