HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Read responses to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in ADC Online Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ray, B Articles by Tuladhar, A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ray, B Articles by Tuladhar, A Topic Collections ADC Archimedes

Is lumbar puncture necessary for evaluation of early neonatal sepsis?

Edited by Bob Phillips

¹ Paediatrics, Northern Deanery, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; brajaray@yahoo.co.uk
² University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton, UK

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

A newborn baby born at 37 weeks is noted to be unwell at 18 h postnatally. The mother gives a history of prolonged rupture of membranes for 36 h. The baby is feeding poorly and is jittery, with a temperature of 38°C. A clinical diagnosis of early sepsis is made and lumbar puncture is suggested on the ward round as a part of sepsis evaluation. Several publications on the use of lumbar puncture in late-onset sepsis, including a recent review article by Malbon et al,¹ suggest that lumbar puncture is an important method of investigation and should be considered in babies for >48 h old, with suspected sepsis.

We wonder whether there is sufficient evidence to justify lumbar puncture in early sepsis.

Structured clinical question
In a newborn (patient), is lumbar puncture (intervention) necessary to rule out meningitis in suspected sepsis (outcome) in the first few days of life . . . [Full text of this article]

eLetters: