HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in ADC Online Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Forsyth, R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Forsyth, R Topic Collections Related Articles

The CHALICE rule: ready for prime time?

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
R Forsyth
Department of Child Health, The Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK; r.j.forsyth@newcastle.ac.uk

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The paper by Dunning et al¹ in this issue discusses a classic medical screening problem. Particularly during the long, light summer evenings, every accident and emergency department in the country sees large numbers of children who have sustained traumatic head injuries, most of which seem trivial; but among such children, there are a small number who are at avoidable risk of severe disability or death. How can they be identified most effectively? In the reported series of around 20 000 children, 95% had not even a brief loss of consciousness and 97% had a Glasgow Coma Scale of 15, but at the tip of the severity pyramid were 281 (1.2%) children with abnormal computed tomograms, 137 (0.6%) of whom required a neurosurgical procedure, and 15 deaths (although the paper does comment on how many of these deaths were deemed potentially preventable).

The authors point out the weakness . . . [Full text of this article]

Related Articles

Atoms

Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2006 91: 877. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]