Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2006;91:799-801; doi:10.1136/adc.2005.092304
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

PERSPECTIVE

Infant death

New knowledge, new insights, and new recommendations

P Fleming1, P Blair2, J McKenna3

1 Infant Health and Developmental Physiology, University of Bristol, UK
2 University of Bristol, UK
3 Department of Anthropology, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Prof. P J Fleming
Institute of Child Life and Health, University of Bristol, UBHT Education Centre, Upper Maudlin St, Bristol BS2 8AE, UK; peter.fleming@bris.ac.uk


Scientific controversy and media hype in unexpected infant deaths

Keywords: infant deaths; SIDS; bedsharing; pacifiers; risk reduction

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The fall in numbers of unexpected infant deaths that followed "Back to Sleep" intervention campaigns in many countries in the early 1990s has been one of the striking achievements of applied epidemiology in the field of child health in modern western society.1,2 The possibility that other modifiable risk factors might be amenable to similar interventions in this mysterious group of conditions has led to multiple studies of the epidemiology of the residual unexpected infant deaths. Having been central participants in the implementation of the "Back to Sleep" campaigns in many countries, the media remain acutely alert to the possibility of any new or significant developments in this field. Thus any public pronouncements by professional organisations must be made in the knowledge that they will attract intense media attention.

The recent Policy Statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) on the changing concept of sudden infant death syndrome . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Atoms
Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2006 91: 799a. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

A brief digest of the October issue
Arch. Dis. Child. 2006 91: e6. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Eisenhut, M., Haycock, G., Greenough, A. (2007). Sudden infant death, bed-sharing and dummies: authors' reply.. Arch. Dis. Child. 92: 560-560 [Full Text]  
  • Baumer, J H (2007). Routine postnatal care given to all babies. EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 92: ep61-ep64 [Full Text]  
  • Berul, C. I., Perry, J. C. (2007). Contribution of Long-QT Syndrome Genes to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Is It Time to Consider Newborn Electrocardiographic Screening?. Circulation 115: 294-296 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Sudden infant death, bed-sharing and dummies
George B Haycock, et al.
ADC Online, 29 Jan 2007 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs