PERSPECTIVE
Circumcision
Circumcision for preventing urinary tract infection in boys: European view
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Padraig S J Malone
Department of Paediatric Nephro-Urology, G Level, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Tremona Rd, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; pat.malone@suht.swest.nhs.uk
Commentary on the paper by Singh-Grewel et al (see page 853)
Keywords: circumcision; urinary tract infection
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Circumcision is the commonest surgical procedure carried out in boys and it probably originated 15 000 years ago.1 It was initially done for religious, ritualistic, and cultural reasons and it was not until the 19th century that the procedure was "medicalised". The original therapeutic circumcisions were performed for phimosis and since then indications for surgery have altered with the trends of the day. In some countries these trends turned to dogma, resulting in the virtual routine circumcision of newborn boys. It was estimated that 61% of all boys born in the USA in 1987 were circumcised.2 It is also fascinating to observe how this dogma can pervade other cultures. Traditionally Koreans did not circumcise their boys until their exposure to many thousands of American troops during the Korean War; now Korea is the only country in that region practising routine circumcision.3 This high rate of routine newborn circumcision generated
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
- Atoms
- Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2005 90: 771.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies
- D Singh-Grewal, J Macdessi, and J Craig
Arch. Dis. Child. 2005 90: 853-858.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Dickerman, J. D.
(2007). Circumcision in the Time of HIV: When Is There Enough Evidence to Revise the American Academy of Pediatrics' Policy on Circumcision?. Pediatrics
119: 1006-1007
[Full Text] -
Hill, G, Geisheker, J V
(2006). Edgar Schoen does not represent the North American view of male circumcision. Arch. Dis. Child.
91: 92-92
[Full Text] -
Hughes, I A
(2005). A perspective on perspectives. Arch. Dis. Child.
90: 771-771
[Full Text]
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Submit a response
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when eLetters are posted
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- Citation Map
Services
- Email this link to a friend
- Similar articles in ADC Online
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
