© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
COMMENTARY
Diagnosis
The need for caution in considering the diagnostic utility of antibasal ganglia antibodies in movement disorders
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Jefferson Street Building 124, 600 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, USA
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr H S Singer
Division of Pediatric Neurology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Jefferson Street Building 124, 600 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-1000, USA; hsinger@jhmi.edu
Commentary on the paper by Church et al (see page 611)
Abbreviations: ABGA, antibasal ganglia antibodies; GABHS, group A ß haemolytic streptococcus; PANDAS, paediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections; SC, Sydenhams chorea; TS, Tourette syndrome
Keywords: Sydenhams chorea; PANDAS; autoimmune; brain
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
"Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." (Sir Winston Churchill, Speech in November 1942)
In this issue, Church and colleagues discuss the possibility that immunological analyses of sera could serve as diagnostic markers for movement disorders associated with streptococcal infection.1 These investigators have been at the forefront of studies evaluating antibasal ganglia antibodies (ABGA) in a variety of proposed poststreptococcal movement conditions. These studies have great potential, given that identification of a specific immune mechanism could lead to insights into pathophysiological mechanisms as well as the development of new therapies. Nevertheless, based on ongoing studies in our laboratory, we feel compelled to raise concerns about the reproducibility of ABGA results, about methodology, and about the inability to confirm serum microinfusion induced alterations of rodent behaviour. As described in the quotation from
Relevant Article
- Anti-basal ganglia antibodies: a possible diagnostic utility in idiopathic movement disorders?
- A J Church, R C Dale, and G Giovannoni
Arch. Dis. Child. 2004 89: 611-614.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Singer, H. S., Hong, J. J., Yoon, D. Y., Williams, P. N.
(2005). Serum autoantibodies do not differentiate PANDAS and Tourette syndrome from controls. Neurology
65: 1701-1707
[Abstract] [Full Text]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Anti-basal ganglia antibodies in movement disorders
- Gavin Giovannoni, et al.
- ADC Online, 6 Aug 2004 [Full text]
- Caution in considering the diagnostic utility of antibasal ganglia antibodies
- Harvey S. Singer, et al.
- ADC Online, 15 Sep 2004 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



