Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2004;89:1089-1093; doi:10.1136/adc.2003.043232
Copyright © 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2004;89:1089-1093
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

LEADING ARTICLE

Specialist registrar

How to assess your specialist registrar

H Davies1, R Howells2

1 Sheffield Children’s NHS Trust, RCPCH lead for Performance Assessment, Sheffield, UK
2 RCPCH Education Fellow and Honorary Clinical Lecturer, University of Cambridge, Department of Paediatrics, Cambridge, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr H Davies
Consultant in Late Effects/Medical Education, Sheffield Children’s NHS Trust, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TH, UK; h.davies@shef.ac.uk

Accepted 23 December 2003


Performance assessment requires careful thought and planning

Keywords: RITA; assessment; postgraduate education; specialist registrar

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

This paper outlines the principles of good assessment, including the importance of defining the purpose of assessment as well as what should be assessed. It then considers how SpR assessment should be undertaken, including possible tools for assessment such as peer ratings, patient assessment mini-CEX, and portfolios. It concludes with a brief discussion of how to draw together the various aspects discussed and some advice on remediation.

There is a requirement for annual assessment of all specialist registrars (SpRs).1 However, this is undertaken on an ad hoc basis with wide variation in practice both between and within specialties. Little of the assessment undertaken to date has been sufficiently robust to withstand legal challenge. Annual assessment for SpRs is soon to be extended to SHOs through Modernising Medical Careers (MMC) and public, political, and professional pressure to show that adequate self regulation has been important in driving revalidation forward. . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Atoms
Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2004 89: 1081. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Davies, H, Khera, N, Stroobant, J (2005). Portfolios, appraisal, revalidation, and all that: a user's guide for consultants. Arch. Dis. Child. 90: 165-170 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs