Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2002;86:76-78; doi:10.1136/adc.86.2.76
Copyright © 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2002;86:76-78
© 2002 Archives of Disease in Childhood

LEADING ARTICLE

Circumcision

Religious circumcision and the Human Rights Act

A R Gatrad1, A Sheikh2, H Jacks1,3

1 Manor Hospital, Moat Road, Walsall WS2 9PS, UK
2 Department of Primary Care and General Practice, Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK
3 Mills & Reeve, 54 Hagley Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham B16 8PE, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A R Gatrad;
steadmana@wht.walsallh-tr.wmids.nhs.uk


Implications for state provision

Keywords: circumcision; religion; National Health Service; Human Rights Act

Medicine today is in a delicate state of balance between the paternalistic and the modern; an increasingly empowered public demands its rights, while the medical profession is frequently seen as taking refuge behind a shield offered by evidence based medicine. When viewed in this context, it is perhaps not surprising that male religious circumcision—the most widely practised surgical operation in the world1—invokes considerable controversy and debate within the secularised West.

It is estimated that one third of the global male population is circumcised.2 Both Jewish and Islamic law sanction and indeed promote religious circumcision for males. Of concern then is the observation made by many that despite the presence of sizeable faith communities in Britain that adhere to this tradition, state provision of services for religious circumcision remains, at best, patchy. Religious minority communities demand the right to practice their faith, while medical opinion in Britain has historically . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Patrick, K. (2007). Is infant male circumcision an abuse of the rights of the child? No. BMJ 335: 1181-1181 [Full Text]  
  • Laird, L. D, Amer, M. M, Barnett, E. D, Barnes, L. L (2007). Muslim patients and health disparities in the UK and the US. Arch. Dis. Child. 92: 922-926 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Crawford, D. A. (2002). Circumcision: A Consideration of Some of the Controversy. J Child Health Care 6: 259-270 [Abstract]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Male circumcision under legal cloud in United Kingdom
George Hill
ADC Online, 7 Feb 2002 [Full text]
The foreskin, and boys, have value
Christopher P Price
ADC Online, 11 Feb 2002 [Full text]
The lesser of two evils
Basil Elnazir
ADC Online, 11 Feb 2002 [Full text]
Circumcision medically, religiously, and legally unjustified
J. Steven Svoboda
ADC Online, 4 Apr 2002 [Full text]
On Gatrad's summary of New Testament teachings about circumcision
Michael Glass
ADC Online, 11 Jun 2003 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs