Annotation
Rationing in child health services: a personal view
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
| |
Introduction |
|---|
Rationing in the UK National Health Service comes in many forms: there is choosing not to see something as a relative health problem in the first place; there are simple straight decisions not to fund treatments, investigations, preventive measures, etc because of lack of resources at that particular time; there is rationing by reasonable methods of priority setting at national and district level. There are also more insidious methods of delaying the implementation of treatments of proved efficacy that, on balance of evidence, should be used. Such delays are done by reassessing, demanding more information, claiming that it is someone else's responsibility, etc. There is also rationing by waiting lists and rationing by illogical resource allocation on the grounds of political expediency.
As a commissioner, while I am aware of these facts I am also aware that
the NHS, compared with other health delivery systems used around the
world, supplies
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
GRANT, L., MACDONALD, P.
(2000). Rationing in child health services. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
82: 257F-257
[Full Text] -
MCLELLAN, N.
(1999). NHS Direct: here and now. Arch. Dis. Child.
81: 376-378
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



