Annotation
Can measures of infant habituation predict later intellectual ability?
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
| |
Introduction |
|---|
By the end of the 1970s, about 50 years of research had shown fairly clearly that prediction coefficients from measures of infant behaviour to later measures of intelligence in childhood were so low as to indicate that, except in extreme cases such as severe subnormality, the early measures had no predictive validity.1 2 From about this time, however, researchers began to question the nature and validity of the infant tests on which these findings were based. It was argued that the `mental scales' on these tests primarily measured perceptual and motor development, rather than mental or cognitive growth, and there is little reason to expect measures of such abilities to predict later IQ.3 4
Accordingly, the search began for cognitive or information processing
measures of infant performance which might more reasonably be
considered to tap abilities that are similar to, and may be predictive
of, the abilities measured by the childhood intelligence tests.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Leslie, G.I., Gibson, F.L., McMahon, C., Cohen, J., Saunders, D.M., Tennant, C.
(2003). Children conceived using ICSI do not have an increased risk of delayed mental development at 5 years of age. Hum Reprod
18: 2067-2072
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



