Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Arch Dis Child. Published Online First: 29 September 2009. doi:10.1136/adc.2009.165647
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2009;0:adc.2009.165647
© 2009 BMJ Publishing Group & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

Adherence to safety guidelines on pediatric procedural sedation: the results of a nationwide survey under general pediatricians in The Netherlands

Piet Leroy1,*, Fred Nieman2, Heleen Blokland-Loggers3, Daphne Schipper4, Luc Zimmermann1, Hans Knape5

1 Department of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Netherlands;
2 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical, Netherlands;
3 Dutch Society of Pediatrics, Section General Pediatrics, Netherlands;
4 Dutch Institute for Health Care Improvement CBO, Netherlands;
5 Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Netherlands

Correspondence to: Piet Leroy, paediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debeyelaan 25, PB 5800, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, Netherlands; p.leroy{at}mumc.nl

Accepted 4 September 2009

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Following two fatal accidents during pediatric procedural sedation (PS), we investigated the level of adherence to established safety standards on PS in a nationwide cohort of fully trained general pediatricians, entrusted with PS.

Study design and methods: Sample survey. Safety guidelines on PS were split into 4 domains (‘Presedation Assessment’, ‘Monitoring during PS’, ‘Recovery after PS’ and ‘Facilities and Competences for Emergencies and Rescue’). Each domain was operationalized into subdomains and items. Items were presented within a questionnaire list as procedural points of attention on which respondents could give their personal adherence score. Percentages of full adherence were calculated. Non-adherence was defined as gradual deviation from full adherence. After factor and reliability analysis, observed scores were summed up to scales and results were transformed to a 0-10 report mark (RM). A RM of ≥ 9 is considered as a satisfactory level of adherence while an RM < 6 is considered as unacceptably low.

Results: Full adherence was rare. For most (sub)domains only a minority of respondents achieved a satisfactory level of adherence. Large numbers of respondents had scores below 6.

Conclusions: Potentially unsafe PS practices are common under Dutch general pediatricians, despite the availability of guidelines. The design of guidelines should include a goal-directed plan for implementation including training, initiatives for continuous quality assurance and improvement and repeated measurements of adherence to guidelines.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs