Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Arch Dis Child. Published Online First: 14 October 2009. doi:10.1136/adc.2009.160283
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2009;0:adc.2009.160283
© 2009 BMJ Publishing Group & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

The Stability Of The Diagnosis Of Developmental Disability Between Age 2 And 8 In A Geographic Cohort Of Very Preterm Children Born In 1997

Gehan Roberts1,*, Lex W Doyle1, Peter J Anderson2

1 The Royal Women's Hospital, Australia;
2 University of Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence to: Gehan Roberts, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, Royal Women's Hospital, 20 Flemington Rd, Parkville, 3052, Australia; gehan.roberts{at}rch.org.au

Accepted 16 September 2009

ABSTRACT

Objective: Studies reporting the developmental outcomes for very preterm children often focus on development at age 2. The aim of this study was to assess the stability of the rates of diagnosis of developmental disability from age 2 to age 8 years in a regional cohort of very preterm and extremely low birth weight children and compare these with term controls.

Methods: Very preterm (22 to 27 completed weeks of gestation, VPT) and extremely low birth weight (birthweight 500-999 g, ELBW) children and matched term controls, born in Victoria, Australia, in 1997, were enrolled at birth in a regional prospective longitudinal study. Outcomes were assessed at ages 2 and 8.

Results: Of the 283 VPT/ELBW livebirths, 71% survived to age 8 and 94% were assessed. Of the 199 controls, 100% survived to age 8 and 86.9% were assessed. At age 2, the rates of nil, mild, moderate and severe disabilities in the VPT/ELBW children were 51.9%, 20.9%, 13.4% and 13.9% respectively, and at age 8 were 43.9%, 36.9%, 10.7% and 8.6%, respectively. Cohen's Kappa statistic revealed poor agreement between disability status at age 2 and 8 for VPT/ ELBW children (0.20, P<0.001), but a higher level of agreement (0.37, P<0.001) for the control children. This was primarily driven by differences in classification of cognitive disability between age 2 and 8.

Conclusions: Developmental outcomes at age 2 are only a moderate predictor of long-term outcome and are not a reliable endpoint for follow-up studies of very preterm and ELBW children.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs