Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 September 2009

Arch Dis Child. Published Online First: 28 May 2009. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.151019
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

Original articles

Food advertising during children's television in Canada and the UK

Jean Adams 1*, Kathleen Hennessy-Priest 2, Sigrun Ingimarsdottir 1, Judy Sheeshka 3, Truls Ostbye 4 and Martin White 1

1 Newcastle University, United Kingdom
2 Coventry University, United Kingdom
3 Guelph University, Canada
4 Duke University School of Medicine, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j.m.adams{at}ncl.ac.uk.

Accepted 13 January 2009


Abstract

Background: Television advertisements for less healthy foods are thought to contribute to overweight and obesity in children. In the UK, new regulations on television food advertising to children came into effect in April 2007. These prohibit advertisements for 'less healthy' foods during or around programmes 'of particular appeal to' children. In Canada, self-regulated codes of practice on television food advertising to children were recently strengthened.

Objective: To document the number and nutritional content of food advertisements 'of particular appeal to' children broadcast in the UK and central Canada before the introduction of the new UK regulations.

Design: All food advertisements broadcast on four popular channels in Canada and the three terrestrial commercial channels in the UK during one week in 2006 were identified and linked to relevant nutritional data. Food advertisements 'of particular appeal to' children and for 'less healthy' products were identified using the criterion in the UK regulations.

Results: 2315 food related advertisements broadcast in Canada and 1365 broadcast in the UK were included. 52-61% were for 'less healthy' products; 5-11% were 'of particular appeal to'children. Around 5% of food advertisements would have been prohibited under the new UK regulations. There were few differences in the nutritional content of food advertisements that were and were not 'of particular appeal to' children.

Conclusion: There was little evidence that foods advertisements 'of particular appeal to' children were any less healthy than those that were not. Few food advertisements are likely to be prohibited by the new UK regulations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Atoms
Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2009 94: i. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs