Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 23 September 2008. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.142026
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2009;94:602-606
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Prospective cohort study to test the predictability of the Cardiff and Vale paediatric early warning system

E D Edwards1, C V E Powell2, B W Mason3, A Oliver4

1 Department of Paediatrics, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK
2 Children’s Hospital for Wales, Department of Child Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
3 Department of Epidemiology, Statistics and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
4 Children’s Hospital for Wales, Department of Paediatric Intensive Care, Cardiff, UK

Dr E D Edwards, Department of Paediatrics, Singleton Hospital, Sketty Lane, Swansea SA2 8QA, UK; Dawn.Edwards{at}swansea-tr.nhs.wales.uk

Objective: To develop and test the predictability of a paediatric early warning score to identify children at risk of developing critical illness.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Admissions to all paediatric wards at the University Hospital of Wales.

Outcome measures: Respiratory arrest, cardiac arrest, paediatric high-dependency unit admission, paediatric intensive care unit admission and death.

Results: Data were collected on 1000 patients. A single abnormal observation determined by the Cardiff and Vale paediatric early warning system (C&VPEWS) had a 89.0% sensitivity (95% CI 80.5 to 94.1), 63.9% specificity (95% CI 63.8 to 63.9), 2.2% positive predictive value (95% CI 2.0 to 2.3) and a 99.8% negative predictive value (95% CI 99.7 to 99.9) for identifying children who subsequently had an adverse outcome. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the C&VPEWS score was 0.86 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.91).

Conclusion: Identifying children likely to develop critical illness can be difficult. The assessment tool developed from the advanced paediatric life support guidelines on identifying sick children appears to be sensitive but not specific. If the C&VPEWS was used as a trigger to activate a rapid response team to assess the child, the majority of calls would be unnecessary.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Atoms
Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2009 94: i. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

True value of PEWS is to improve awareness of what is happening rather than what’s going to happen
John J Fitzsimons, et al.
ADC Online, 24 Aug 2009 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs