Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 December 2009

Arch Dis Child. Published Online First: 29 September 2009. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.140194
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2009;0:adc.2008.140194
© 2009 BMJ Publishing Group & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

Comparison of morphine concentration-time profiles following intravenous and intranasal diamorphine in children.

Susan Kidd1,*, Thomas Beattie1, Sarah Brennan1, Rhona Stephen2, Robert Minns2

1 Royal Hospital for Sick Children Edinburgh, United Kingdom;
2 Department of child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Correspondence to: Susan Louise Kidd, A&E, Royal Hospital for Sick Children Edinburgh, Dept A&E, Royal Hospital for Sick Children Edinburgh, Sceinnes road, Edinburgh, EH9 1LF, United Kingdom; su.kidd{at}dsl.pipex.com

Accepted 2 September 2009

ABSTRACT

Background: Current best practice for treating acute severe pain in children is intravenous (IV) or intranasal (IN) opioid. IN diamorphine offers less traumatic analgesia than the potentially difficult and distressing IV route. However, there has been no direct comparison of IN and IV diamorphine nor are there pharmacokinetic data for IN diamorphine in children.

Objective: To compare plasma morphine concentration-time profiles following IN and IV diamorphine.

Design: Observational.

Setting: City-centre paediatric teaching hospital A&E department.

Patients: Children, aged 3-13 years, with isolated limb fracture.

Interventions: An IV catheter was sited and base-line blood taken. The first 12 children received IV diamorphine (0.1mg/kg), and the subsequent 12, IN diamorphine (0.1mg/kg) in 0.2 ml sterile water drops. Subsequent samples were taken at 2, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 60 minutes.

Measurements: Plasma morphine radioimmunoassay.

Results: Peak plasma morphine concentrations were higher (median 109 vs 36nmol/l), and occurred earlier (median 2 vs 10 minutes), with greater area under the curve (3761 vs 1794nmol/l/h) following IV compared to IN diamorphine (all p<0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test). Higher plasma concentrations at 60 minutes (47 vs 32nmol/l) were also observed following IV diamorphine (p = 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test).

Conclusions: Our evidence supports the wider use of diamorphine by nasal drops in children, showing that adequate plasma levels of morphine are usually achieved. However, we showed significantly attenuated and delayed peak plasma morphine levels with lower levels at one hour compared to IV diamorphine.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs