Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 March 2008

Arch Dis Child. Published Online First: 6 November 2007. doi:10.1136/adc.2007.128132
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

Original articles

Ambiguous abbreviations: an audit of abbreviations in paediatric note keeping

Joanna E Sheppard 1, Laura C E Weidner 1, Saher Zakai 1, Simon Fountain-Polley 1* and Judith Williams 1

1 Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pollgysim{at}yahoo.com.

Accepted 30 October 2007


Abstract

Objective: To assess frequency, nature and understanding of abbreviations in medical records.

Design: Audit of abbreviation use and meaning in paediatric handover sheets and medical notes compared against two standards, the Trust Intranet Medical Dictionary (TID) and Mosby’s Medical Dictionary (MMD). A selection of abbreviations was shown to health care professionals to examine interpretation of abbreviations.

Setting: Large inner-city district general hospital, Birmingham, UK

Main Outcome Measures: Frequency, nature and understanding of abbreviations in paediatric medical records.

Results: On 25 handover sheets a total of 2286 abbreviations were used, with 221 different abbreviations; the standards recognised 14% (TID) and 20% (MMD) of these abbreviations. In 168 sets of medical notes a total of 3668 abbreviations were used, with 479 different abbreviations; the standards recognised 15% (TID) and 17% (MMD). Some words were shortened in different forms, e.g. normal (N, Nl, NAD) and some abbreviations had multiple interpretations to those intended e.g. TOF (tetralogy of Fallot, tracheo-oesophageal fistula). When presented with a selection of abbreviations paediatric doctors recognized 56-94% and other health care professionals recognised 31-63%.

Conclusion: Abbreviation use was widespread in paediatric note keeping. There was no systematic approach to this and difficulties in interpretation were demonstrated. The use of standardised abbreviations to avoid confusion is suggested.

Keywords: Abbreviations, Medical Records, Paediatrics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Atoms
Howard Bauchner, Editor-in-
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008 93: 1. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Walsh, K. E, Gurwitz, J. H (2008). Medical abbreviations: writing little and communicating less. Arch. Dis. Child. 93: 816-817 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs