Archives of Disease in Childhood 2009;94:354-358
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Prospective parental consent for autopsy research following sudden unexpected childhood deaths: a successful model
1 UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
2 UCL Institute of Womens Health and University College London Hospitals, London, UK
3 Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
4 Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
5 Neural Development Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
6 Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
7 Cardiovascular Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
Dr Sudhin Thayyil, Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, UCL Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK; s.thayyil{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk
Background: Organ retention issues, recent changes in the Coroners (Amendment) Rules 2005 and the Human Tissue Act have resulted in pessimism regarding prospective consent for paediatric autopsy research in the UK.
Objectives: To examine the feasibility and acceptability of a prospective telephone consenting model for post-mortem magnetic resonance (MR) imaging research in HM Coroners cases.
Design: Following each autopsy referral from the HM Coroner, permission to contact the family for research was requested. A family liaison sister, with experience in dealing with bereaved families, then contacted the parents by telephone, explained the study and obtained oral, and then written consent for post-mortem imaging.
Setting: London and an area south of London.
Results: Of 76 eligible HM Coroners cases referred during the study period, permission to contact parents (provided by the HM Coroners Office) was obtained for only 32 cases (42%). The research sister contacted 32 parents during the study period of whom 31 (96.8%) gave oral research consent. "Helping other parents in the future" and "the importance of post-mortem research" were the main reasons for parents wanting to participate in research.
Conclusions: Prospective consenting for HM Coroners cases for research is feasible in children, and can be done ethically by parental consenting via telephone contact before autopsy by appropriately trained staff. However, close co-ordination between mortuary staff, HM Coroners, research staff and medical staff is required. This model may be useful in performing post-mortem research in HM Coroners cases and in developing paediatric tissue and brain banks in the UK.
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



