ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 15 March 2007. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.114835
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2008;93:207-211
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2006.114835v1
93/3/207    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, T N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, T N
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Original articles

The problems in scaling adult drug doses to children

T N Johnson

Correspondence to:
Dr T N Johnson, Pharmacy Department, Children’s Hospital, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TH, UK; trevor.johnson{at}sch.nhs.uk

Background: Many drugs are unlicensed in children and consequently their doses have been scaled down from those used in adults.

Objective: To compare the performance of three scaling models in predicting maintenance doses for children from those used in adults.

Methods: Three scaling models based on body weight (BW), body surface area (BSA) and BW0.75 were used to predict maintenance doses across the paediatric age band from the equivalent adult doses for 30 different drugs. The predicted doses were compared with those in the British National Formulary for children 2006 (BNFc). Percentage error and mean squared prediction error were used as a measure of precision, and mean prediction error was used as a measure of bias.

Results: In the 1-month and 12-month age groups, the different approaches ranked on their bias (least bias first) were BW<BW0.75<BSA and on their precision (most precise first) were BW>BW0.75>BSA. The BSA and BW0.75 methods predicted doses up to 2.86-fold higher than the BNFc in the 1-month and 1-year age group. In the 7-year and 12-year age groups, BW0.75 and BSA performed better than BW for precision and bias, and no predictions were more than 1.8-fold higher than the BNFc. The BW method tended to also under-predict dose across the paediatric age range.

Conclusions: Dose scaling should only be used as a last resort for determining a suitable dose in children. No single method was suitable across the entire paediatric age range.



Related Article

One size does not fit all: getting drug doses right for children
Daniel B Hawcutt and Rosalind L Smyth
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008 93: 190-191. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
D. B Hawcutt and R. L Smyth
One size does not fit all: getting drug doses right for children
Arch. Dis. Child., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 190 - 191.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health