Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 30 June 2008. doi:10.1136/adc.2007.136739
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2008;93:1048-1053
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The role of post-mortem investigations in determining the cause of sudden unexpected death in infancy

M A Weber1, M T Ashworth1, R A Risdon1, J C Hartley2, M Malone1, N J Sebire1

1 Department of Paediatric Pathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
2 Paediatric Microbiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK

N J Sebire, Department of Paediatric Pathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK; SebirN{at}gosh.nhs.uk

Introduction: Several autopsy protocols have been suggested for investigating sudden unexpected deaths in infancy (SUDI). The aim of this study is to provide data on the utility of such post-mortem investigations from a large paediatric autopsy series to inform future policy.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of >1500 consecutive post-mortem examinations carried out by specialist paediatric pathologists at a single centre during a 10-year period according to a common autopsy protocol that included the use of detailed ancillary investigations. SUDI was defined as the sudden unexpected death of an infant aged from 7 to 365 days. All data capture and cause of death classification were carried out according to defined criteria.

Results: Of 1516 paediatric post-mortem examinations, 546 presented as SUDI. In 202 infants (37%), death was explained by the autopsy findings. The other 344 cases (63%) remained unexplained. Of the explained deaths, over half (58%) were infective, most commonly due to pneumonia (22%). The component of the post-mortem examination that primarily determined the final cause of death was histological examination in 92 infants (46%), macroscopic examination in 61 (30%), microbiological investigations in 38 (19%) and clinical history in 10 (5%).

Conclusion: This constitutes the largest single-institution autopsy study of SUDI. Ten years on from the Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy (CESDI) SUDI studies, the ascertainment of a cause of death at autopsy has improved. However, with almost two thirds of SUDI remaining unexplained, alternative and/or additional diagnostic techniques are required to improve detection rates of identifiable causes of death at autopsy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Thayyil, S, Robertson, N J, Scales, A, Weber, M A, Jacques, T S, Sebire, N J, Taylor, A M, on the behalf of the MaRIAS (Magnetic Resonance Im, (2009). Prospective parental consent for autopsy research following sudden unexpected childhood deaths: a successful model. Arch. Dis. Child. 94: 354-358 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs