Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 11 April 2007. doi:10.1136/adc.2007.117424
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2007;92:672-677
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Decision making in asthma exacerbation: a clinical judgement analysis

John Jenkins2, Mike Shields1, Chris Patterson1, Frank Kee1

1 Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
2 Queen’s University Belfast, Paediatric Department, Antrim Hospital, Antrim BT41 2RL, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr John Jenkins
Queen’s University Belfast, Paediatric Department, Antrim Hospital, Antrim BT41 2RL, UK; j.jenkins{at}qub.ac.uk

Background: Clinical decisions which impact directly on patient safety and quality of care are made during acute asthma attacks by individual doctors based on their knowledge and experience. Decisions include administration of systemic corticosteroids (CS) and oral antibiotics, and admission to hospital. Clinical judgement analysis provides a methodology for comparing decisions between practitioners with different training and experience, and improving decision making.

Methods: Stepwise linear regression was used to select clinical cues based on visual analogue scale assessments of the propensity of 62 clinicians to prescribe a short course of oral CS (decision 1), a course of antibiotics (decision 2), and/or admit to hospital (decision 3) for 60 "paper" patients.

Results: When compared by specialty, paediatricians’ models for decision 1 were more likely to include level of alertness as a cue (54% vs 16%); for decision 2 they were more likely to include presence of crepitations (49% vs 16%) and less likely to include inhaled CS (8% vs 40%), respiratory rate (0% vs 24%) and air entry (70% vs 100%). When compared to other grades, the models derived for decision 3 by consultants/general practitioners were more likely to include wheeze severity as a cue (39% vs 6%).

Conclusions: Clinicians differed in their use of individual cues and the number included in their models. Patient safety and quality of care will benefit from clarification of decision-making strategies as general learning points during medical training, in the development of guidelines and care pathways, and by clinicians developing self-awareness of their own preferences.

Abbreviations: A&E, accident and emergency; CS, corticosteroids; GPs, general practitioners; VAS, visual analogue scale

Keywords: clinical judgement analysis; decision making; asthma; systemic corticosteroids; hospital admission


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

A brief digest of the August issue
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: e8. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs