Archives of Disease in Childhood 2007;92:495-498
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Variation in policies for the management of febrile neutropenia in United Kingdom Childrens Cancer Study Group centres
1 Paediatric Oncology Day Hospital, St Jamess Hospital, Leeds, UK
2 Royal Liverpool Childrens NHS Trust, Alder Hey, Liverpool, UK
3 Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
4 Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
5 Centre for Nursing and Allied Health Professions Research, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
6 Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr Bob Phillips
Paediatric Oncology Day Hospital, St Jamess Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; bob.phillips{at}doctors.org.uk
Objective: To assess the variation in the current UK management strategies for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in childhood.
Design and setting: A postal survey of all 21 United Kingdom Childrens Cancer Study Group (UKCCSG) centres assessing and collating local policies, protocols or guidelines relating to the management of febrile neutropenia. Further direct contact was undertaken to clarify any uncertainties.
Results: All 21 centres provided information. The policies used to manage febrile neutropenia in the centres around the UK vary in almost every aspect of management. Definitions of fever ranged from a persistent temperature of >37.5°C to a single reading of >39°C. Neutropenia was inconsistently defined as an absolute neutrophil count of <1x109, <0.75x109 or <0.5x109. Choices of antibiotic approaches, empirical modifications and antistaphylococcal treatment were different in each protocol. The use of risk stratification was undertaken in 11 centres, with six using a policy of reduced intensity therapy in low risk cases. Empirical antifungal treatment was very poorly described and varied even more widely.
Conclusions: There was a great deal of variation in definitions and treatment of febrile neutropenia in the UKCCSG childrens cancer treatment centres. A degree of variation as a result of local microbiological differences is to be expected, but beyond this we should seek to standardise the core of our approach to defining fever and neutropenia, risk stratification and duration of empirical therapy in a way that maintains safety, minimises resource utilisation and maximises quality of life.
Abbreviations: CVC, central venous catheter; FNP, febrile neutropenia; NICE, National Institute for Clinical Excellence; UKCCSG, United Kingdom Childrens Cancer Study Group
Relevant Articles
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: 471.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: e6.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Commondoor, R, Murray, M J
(2009). A patient with leukaemia turns blue. EDUCATION AND PRACTICE
94: 10-17
[Full Text]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Febrile neutropenia in the United Kingdom- time to standardize care?
- Sarah L Humphrey, et al.
- ADC Online, 12 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



