ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Archives of Disease in Childhood 2007;92:416-422; doi:10.1136/adc.2006.113589
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow web only tables
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westwood, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rudolf, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westwood, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rudolf, M.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Childhood obesity: should primary school children be routinely screened? A systematic review and discussion of the evidence

Marie Westwood1, Debra Fayter1, Suzanne Hartley2, Amber Rithalia1, Gary Butler3, Paul Glasziou4, Martin Bland5, John Nixon1, Lisa Stirk1, Mary Rudolf6

1 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
2 Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
3 Institute of Health Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
4 Department for Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
5 Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
6 Department of Community Paediatrics, Leeds Primary Care Trust and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Marie Westwood
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK; mew3{at}york.ac.uk

Background: Population monitoring has been introduced in UK primary schools in an effort to track the growing obesity epidemic. It has been argued that parents should be informed of their child’s results, but is there evidence that moving from monitoring to screening would be effective? We describe what is known about the effectiveness of monitoring and screening for overweight and obesity in primary school children and highlight areas where evidence is lacking and research should be prioritised.

Design: Systematic review with discussion of evidence gaps and future research.

Data sources: Published and unpublished studies (any language) from electronic databases (inception to July 2005), clinical experts, Primary Care Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities, and reference lists of retrieved studies.

Review methods: We included any study that evaluated measures of overweight and obesity as part of a population-level assessment and excluded studies whose primary outcome measure was prevalence.

Results: There were no trials assessing the effectiveness of monitoring or screening for overweight and obesity. Studies focussed on the diagnostic accuracy of measurements. Information on the attitudes of children, parents and health professionals to monitoring was extremely sparse.

Conclusions: Our review found a lack of data on the potential impact of population monitoring or screening for obesity and more research is indicated. Identification of effective weight reduction strategies for children and clarification of the role of preventative measures are priorities. It is difficult to see how screening to identify individual children can be justified without effective interventions.


Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; IOTF, International Obesity Taskforce; NSC, National Screening Committee; PCT, Primary Care Trust

Keywords: obesity; overweight; monitoring; screening; BMI


Relevant Article

A brief digest of the May issue
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: e5. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINEHome page
L. Terre
Back-to-School Health Promotion
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, September 1, 2008; 2(5): 402 - 405.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
D Hall, T Cole, D Elliman, P Gibson, S Logan, and J Wales
Growth monitoring
Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 717 - 718.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. Bush
Update in Pediatric Lung Disease 2007
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2008; 177(7): 686 - 695.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
G. Hughes
Hygieia
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, August 1, 2007; 61(8): 752 - 752.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Thank goodness children can be cruel
Minoo Irani
ADC Online, 1 May 2007 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health