| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
1 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
2 Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
3 Institute of Health Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
4 Department for Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
5 Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
6 Department of Community Paediatrics, Leeds Primary Care Trust and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Marie Westwood
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK; mew3{at}york.ac.uk
Background: Population monitoring has been introduced in UK primary schools in an effort to track the growing obesity epidemic. It has been argued that parents should be informed of their child’s results, but is there evidence that moving from monitoring to screening would be effective? We describe what is known about the effectiveness of monitoring and screening for overweight and obesity in primary school children and highlight areas where evidence is lacking and research should be prioritised.
Design: Systematic review with discussion of evidence gaps and future research.
Data sources: Published and unpublished studies (any language) from electronic databases (inception to July 2005), clinical experts, Primary Care Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities, and reference lists of retrieved studies.
Review methods: We included any study that evaluated measures of overweight and obesity as part of a population-level assessment and excluded studies whose primary outcome measure was prevalence.
Results: There were no trials assessing the effectiveness of monitoring or screening for overweight and obesity. Studies focussed on the diagnostic accuracy of measurements. Information on the attitudes of children, parents and health professionals to monitoring was extremely sparse.
Conclusions: Our review found a lack of data on the potential impact of population monitoring or screening for obesity and more research is indicated. Identification of effective weight reduction strategies for children and clarification of the role of preventative measures are priorities. It is difficult to see how screening to identify individual children can be justified without effective interventions.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; IOTF, International Obesity Taskforce; NSC, National Screening Committee; PCT, Primary Care Trust
Keywords: obesity; overweight; monitoring; screening; BMI
Relevant Article
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: e5.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Terre Back-to-School Health Promotion American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, September 1, 2008; 2(5): 402 - 405. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D Hall, T Cole, D Elliman, P Gibson, S Logan, and J Wales Growth monitoring Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 717 - 718. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Bush Update in Pediatric Lung Disease 2007 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2008; 177(7): 686 - 695. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Hughes Hygieia J. Epidemiol. Community Health, August 1, 2007; 61(8): 752 - 752. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all eLetters
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
| ARCH DIS CHILD | FETAL NEONATAL ED | ED PRACTICE |
