HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) web only references All Versions of this Article: adc.2005.087288v1 92/2/120    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in ADC Online Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lucas, P Articles by Roberts, H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lucas, P Articles by Roberts, H Topic Collections Related Articles

A systematic review of lay views about infant size and growth

¹ School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
² Child Health Research & Policy Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, City University, London, UK
³ MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
⁴ Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
⁵ Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr P Lucas
School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol BS8 1TZ, UK; patricia.lucas{at}bristol.ac.uk

Objectives: To understand lay views on infant size and growth and their implications for a British population.

Methods: A systematic review of parental and other lay views about the meanings and importance of infant size and growth using Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, IBSS, ASSIA, British Nursing Index ChildData, Caredata, SIGLE, Dissertation Abstracts (US), Index to Theses. 19 studies, most of which reported the views of mothers, from the US, Canada, the UK and Finland were reviewed.

Results: Notions of healthy size and growth were dominated by the concept of normality. Participants created norms by assessing and comparing size and growth against several reference points. When size or growth differed from these norms, explanations were sought for factors that would account for this difference. When no plausible explanation could be found, growth or size became a worry for parents.

Conclusions: Parents consider the importance of contextual factors when judging what is appropriate or healthy growth. For public health advice to be effective, lay, as well as scientific, findings and values need to be considered.

Abbreviations: WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children

Related Articles

Atoms

Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: 95. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M Petticrew, M Egan, H Thomson, V Hamilton, R Kunkler, and H Roberts Publication bias in qualitative research: what becomes of qualitative research presented at conferences? J. Epidemiol. Community Health, June 1, 2008; 62(6): 552 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Lucas, C. Law, J. Baird, and H. Roberts The views of professionals toward infant growth Arch. Dis. Child., July 1, 2007; 92(7): 655 - 655. [Full Text] [PDF]

				I Hughes Confusing terminology attempts to define the undefinable Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 97 - 98. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M Wright and L. T Weaver Image or reality: why do infant size and growth matter to parents? Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 98 - 100. [Full Text] [PDF]