ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 31 January 2006. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.085191
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2006;91:396-400
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2005.085191v1
adc.2005.085191v2
91/5/396    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malavige, G N
Right arrow Articles by Seneviratne, S L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malavige, G N
Right arrow Articles by Seneviratne, S L

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Patterns of disease in Sri Lankan dengue patients

G N Malavige1, P K Ranatunga2, V G N S Velathanthiri1, S Fernando1, D H Karunatilaka2, J Aaskov3, S L Seneviratne4

1 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayawardenapura, Sri Lanka
2 Lady Ridgeway Hospital for Children, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
3 Arbovirus Reference Centre, Queensland, Australia
4 Department of Clinical Immunology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S L Seneviratne
Department of Clinical Immunology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; suran200{at}yahoo.co.uk

Background: Dengue is the most important mosquito borne viral infection in the world. Nearly 90% of infections occur in children. At present, prospective information on clinical and laboratory findings in South Asian children with dengue is generally lacking.

Aim: To describe patterns of clinical disease in a cohort of children hospitalised with dengue during a major dengue epidemic in Sri Lanka.

Results: A total of 104 children were studied during a three month period. Eighteen had dengue fever (DF) and 86 had dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF). Of those with DHF, 34, 23, 27, and 2 had DHF grade I, II, III, and IV respectively. Based on dengue serology testing, 13 of the DF patients had a primary infection and 5 had secondary dengue infections. In contrast, 68 of the children with DHF had secondary and 18 had primary dengue infections. Oral candidiasis was seen in 19 children. The odds ratio for children with secondary dengue infection to develop DHF was 9.8 (95% CI 3.1 to 31.2).

Conclusion: Studies on patterns of paediatric dengue disease in different regions should help clinicians and health administrators make more informed and evidence based health planning decisions. It should also help towards mapping out dengue trends on a global scale. Oral candidiasis has not been previously documented in children suffering with acute dengue in Sri Lanka or elsewhere. Studying underlying reasons for this manifestation during future dengue epidemics may provide useful leads in understanding overall dengue pathogenesis.


Abbreviations: DF, dengue fever; DHF, dengue haemorrhagic fever; DSS, dengue shock syndrome

Keywords: candida; Sri Lanka; clinical findings; dengue; laboratory findings







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health