© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Hospital based alternatives to acute paediatric admission: a systematic review
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr D Ogilvie
MRC Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK; d.ogilvie{at}msoc.mrc.gla.ac.uk
Aims: To synthesise published evidence of the impacts of introducing hospital based alternatives to acute paediatric admission.
Methods: Systematic review of studies of interventions for children with acute medical problems. Main outcome measures were: admission or discharge, unscheduled returns to hospital, satisfaction of parents and general practitioners, effects on health service activity, and costs.
Results: Twenty five studies were included: one randomised controlled trial, 23 observational or cross-sectional studies, and one qualitative study. Many studies were of uncertain quality or were open to significant potential bias. About 40% of children attending acute assessment units in paediatric departments, and over 60% of those attending acute assessment units in A&E departments, do not require inpatient admission. There is little evidence of serious clinical consequences in children discharged from these units, although up to 7% may subsequently return to hospital. There is some evidence that users are satisfied with these services and that they are associated with reductions in inpatient activity levels and certain hospital costs. Evidence about the impact of urgent outpatient clinics is very limited.
Conclusions: Current evidence supports a view that acute paediatric assessment services are a safe, efficient, and acceptable alternative to inpatient admission, but this evidence is of limited quantity and quality. Further research is required to confirm that this type of service reorganisation does not disadvantage children and their families, particularly where inpatient services are withdrawn from a hospital.
Keywords: acute; emergency; admissions; assessment units; ambulatory care
Relevant Article
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Arch. Dis. Child. 2005 90: 113-114.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Blair, M, Gore, J, Isaza, F, Pajak, S, Malhotra, A, Islam, S, Vigneswaran, T V, Lachman, P
(2008). Multi-method evaluation of a paediatric ambulatory care unit (PACU): impact on families and staff. Arch. Dis. Child.
93: 681-685
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Strehle, E M, Shabde, N
(2006). One hundred years of telemedicine: does this new technology have a place in paediatrics?. Arch. Dis. Child.
91: 956-959
[Full Text] -
Levett, I, Berry, K, Wacogne, I
(2006). Review of a paediatric emergency department observation unit.. Emerg. Med. J.
23: 612-613
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Goldbloom, R B
(2005). The evolution of paediatric hospitals. Arch. Dis. Child.
90: 113-114
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



