HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Web-only appendices All Versions of this Article: adc.2005.080432v1 90/12/1297    most recent Submit a response Read responses to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in ADC Online Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ellis, J C Articles by Molyneux, E M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ellis, J C Articles by Molyneux, E M

Introduction of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis for sexually abused children in Malawi

Department of Paediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr J C Ellis
Department of Paediatrics, College of Medicine, Private Bag 360, Blantyre 3, Malawi; janeellis123{at}yahoo.co.uk

Aims: To improve the care of children who are victims of child sexual abuse (CSA) by routinely assessing eligibility for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of such treatment started in a paediatric emergency department in Malawi.

Methods: Children presenting to the Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2004 with a history of alleged CSA were assessed for eligibility for HIV PEP and followed prospectively for six months.

Results: A total of 64 children presented with a history of alleged CSA in the 12 month period; 17 were offered PEP. The remainder were not offered PEP because of absence of physical signs of abuse (n = 20), delay in presentation beyond 72 hours from assault (n = 11), repeated sexual abuse in the preceding six months (n = 15), and HIV infection found on initial testing (n = 1). No family refused an HIV test. No side effects due to antiretroviral therapy were reported. Of the 17 children commenced on PEP, 11 returned for review after one month, seven returned at three months, and two of 15 returned at six months post-assault. None have seroconverted.

Conclusions: In a resource-poor setting with a high HIV prevalence, HIV PEP following CSA is acceptable, safe, and feasible. HIV PEP should be incorporated in to national guidelines in countries with a high community prevalence of HIV infection.

Abbreviations: ART, antiretroviral therapy; CSA, child sexual abuse; PEP, post-exposure prophylaxis; STI, sexually transmitted infection

Keywords: child sexual abuse; HIV post-exposure prophylaxis; resource-poor setting

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J C Ellis, S Ahmad, and E M Molyneux Introduction of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis for sexually abused children in Malawi Sex. Transm. Inf., February 1, 2006; 82(1): 30 - 30. [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: