ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The importance of acknowledging clinical uncertainty in the diagnosis of epilepsy and non-epileptic events

R Beach, R Reading

Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr R Beach
Jenny Lind Children’s Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK; richard.beach{at}nnuh.nhs.uk

Background: Failure to recognise diagnostic uncertainty between the epilepsies and non-epileptic events may be a factor in high rates of misdiagnosis.

Aims: To explore the results of acknowledging diagnostic uncertainty in a cohort of children presenting with paroxysmal events.

Methods: Children (29 days–16th birthday) with new presentations of paroxysmal disorders were ascertained through outpatients, admissions, and accident and emergency over a two year period in a district hospital with a catchment population of 500 000. Cases were classified by diagnosis at entry and 6–30 months later. A random selection of cases was independently assessed.

Results: A total of 684 cases were ascertained. Attacks were initially classified as febrile seizures (n = 212), acute symptomatic epileptic seizures (n = 5), epilepsies (n = 83), unclassified (possible epilepsy) (n = 90), isolated epileptic seizures (n = 51), and non-epileptic events (n = 243). Case review enabled reclassification of 61 of those initially unclassified—31 to an epilepsy and 27 to non-epileptic events. In 29 the final diagnosis was never clarified. These were 23 cases with confusing or absent histories and six with short lived seizure clusters. Prognosis for these 29 cases was good; 75% had been discharged. None were on long term medication. The diagnosis in the 131 cases confirmed as epilepsy was stable. Independent review of a random sample showed full concordance with one neurologist and 20% uncertainty with another.

Conclusion: In addition to definite epilepsy or non-epileptic events it is helpful to recognise a group of cases where the diagnosis is uncertain—unclassified paroxysmal events. Reassessment of these cases enables accurate diagnosis and may prevent a hasty and incorrect diagnosis of epilepsy.

Abbreviations: AED, anti-epilepsy drug; EEG, electroencephalogram; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging

Keywords: epilepsy; differential diagnosis; paroxysmal disorders; non-epileptic events; seizures

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Atoms

Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2005 90: 1211. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Cameron, D. (2007). How has research changed my practice in the last 5 years?. Arch. Dis. Child. 92: 1020-1023 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stephenson, J. B. P. (2007). Clinical Diagnosis of Syncopes (Including So-called Breath-Holding Spells) Without Electroencephalography or Ocular Compression. J Child Neurol 22: 502-508 [Abstract]