Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2004;89:625-630; doi:10.1136/adc.2003.032599
Copyright © 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2004;89:625-630
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Validation of the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score

B Stewart1, G Lancaster2, J Lawson1, K Williams1, J Daly1

1 Royal Liverpool Children’s Hospital NHS Trust, Alder Hey, Liverpool, UK
2 Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr B Stewart
Royal Liverpool Children’s Hospital NHS Trust, Alder Hey, Eaton Road, Liverpool LA1 2AP, UK; annebriar{at}aol.com

Aims: To describe the validation and reliability of a new pain tool (the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score, AHTPS) for children at triage in the accident and emergency (A&E) setting.

Methods: A new behavioural observational pain tool was developed because of dissatisfaction with available tools and a lack of confidence in self-assessment scores at triage. The study was conducted in a large paediatric A&E department; 575 children (aged 0–16 years) were included. Inter-rater reliability and various aspects of validity were assessed. In addition this tool was compared to the Wong-Baker self-assessment tool.1 The children were concurrently scored by a research nurse and triage nurses to assess inter-rater reliability. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse’s triage score with the research nurse reassessment score after intervention and/or analgesia. Known group construct validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse’s score at triage with the level of pain of the condition as judged by the discharge diagnosis. Predictive validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse’s AHTPS with the level of analgesia needed by each patient. The AHTPS was also compared to a self-assessment score.

Results: A high level of inter-rater reliability, kappa statistic 0.84 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.88), was shown. Construct validity was well demonstrated; known group construct validity and predictive validity were also demonstrated to a varying degree.

Conclusions: Results support the use of this observational pain scoring tool in the triage of children in A&E.

Keywords: pain scoring tools; pain assessment; triage


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Stewart, B, Lawson, J, Williams, K (2009). In support of observational pain tools for emergency medicine triage in children. Emerg. Med. J. 26: 466-467 [Full Text]  
  • Shavit, I, Kofman, M, Leder, M, Hod, T, Kozer, E (2008). Observational pain assessment versus self-report in paediatric triage. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 552-555 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Parslow, P., Sandell, J. (2005). Paediatric chest drains: past, present and percutaneous. Trauma 7: 163-170 [Abstract]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs