Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2004;89:469-471; doi:10.1136/adc.2003.029413
Copyright © 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2004;89:469-471
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Best paediatric evidence; is it accessible and used on-call?

F A I Riordan1, E M Boyle2, B Phillips3

1 Dept of Child Health, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, UK
2 Neonatal Unit, Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Edinburgh, UK
3 Dept of Child Health, York District Hospital, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr F A I Riordan
Department of Child Health, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Bordeseley Green East, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK; Andrew.Riordan{at}heartsol.wmids.nhs.uk

Background: Paediatricians wanting to use evidence based medicine (EBM) strategies, need to be able to track down and critically appraise evidence. This requires access to quality filtered resources (for example, Cochrane Library), bibliographic databases (for example, Medline), and paediatric journals.

Aims: To determine whether paediatricians have access to these resources when on-call and if they use them to answer clinical questions.

Method: A telephone survey of paediatric and neonatal units was performed during November 2001. The "paediatrician-on-call" was asked whether they could access Medline, Cochrane, and paediatric journals, and if they used these when on-call.

Results: Paediatric trainees were available in 87 of the 97 units contacted. All except one had access to Medline; although only 56 (64%) could do this near their ward. Eighty had access to Cochrane. Thirteen (15%) could not gain access to their library out-of-hours. All except one department had local guidelines, with 71% having >15 guidelines. Access to any of the top seven "best evidence" paediatric journals varied from 64% to 100%. Only 26% of trainees had read the evidence based section of Archives of Disease of Childhood, Archimedes. Many trainees claimed to use guidelines when on-call (61; 70%), but few used Medline (14; 16%).

Conclusions: Paediatric trainees mostly have access to facilities to help them to track down and critically appraise evidence. However, few of them have used it to help make clinical decisions when on-call. Many of the doctors contacted said they used local guidelines as their source of information on-call.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Prendiville, T W, Saunders, J, Fitzsimons, J (2009). The information-seeking behaviour of paediatricians accessing web-based resources. Arch. Dis. Child. 94: 633-635 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Moyer, V (2004). Evidence based medicine: is it practical?. Arch. Dis. Child. 89: 399-400 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs