Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2003;88:512-516; doi:10.1136/adc.88.6.512
Copyright © 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2003;88:512-516
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Fosfomycin for the initial treatment of acute haematogenous osteomyelitis

N Corti1, F H Sennhauser2, U G Stauffer3, D Nadal1

1 Division of Infectious Diseases, University Children’s Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2 Department of Paediatrics, University Children’s Hospital of Zurich
3 Department of Paediatric Surgery, University Children’s Hospital of Zurich

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr D Nadal, Division of Infectious Diseases, University Children’s Hospital of Zurich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland;
david.nadal{at}kispi.unizh.ch

Background and Aims: At our institution there has been a dichotomous antimicrobial treatment behaviour for acute haematogenous osteomyelitis (AHOM) since 1984. The surgical department favoured fosfomycin as initial choice and the medical department ß lactams. We aimed to compare the performance of both strategies.

Methods: Data from patients discharged with the diagnosis of AHOM between January 1984 and January 1998 were gathered from the charts by means of a questionnaire. Patients receiving fosfomycin treatment (FT) were compared with those receiving fosfomycin plus other antimicrobials (FT+) and those receiving no fosfomycin treatment (NFT).

Results: A total of 103 patients aged 0.1–15.5 years (mean 6.5, median 6.9) with AHOM received no surgical treatment initially. In 23 (22.3%) FT was instilled initially, in 47 (45.6%) FT+, and in 33 (32.0%) NFT. The pathogen was established in 30%, 36%, and 42% of FT, FT+, and NFT patients, respectively, Staphylococcus aureus being the predominant isolate. Mean C reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rates normalised in all treatment groups after two and four weeks, respectively. The mean duration of intravenous antimicrobial treatment in FT patients was 2.5 weeks, in FT+ patients 3.1 weeks, and in NFT patients 3.8 weeks (p < 0.05), whereas the mean duration of intravenous plus oral treatment was comparable (7.1 v 6.8 v 6.5 weeks).

Conclusions: The leucocyte penetrating fosfomycin performed similarly to extracellular ß lactams in the treatment of AHOM. Intravenous treatment for longer than 2.5 weeks offered no advantage.

Keywords: acute haematogenous osteomyelitis; fosfomycin; ß lactams

Abbreviations: AHOM, acute haematogenous osteomyelitis; CRP, C reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FT, fosfomycin treatment; FT+, fosfomycin plus other antimicrobials; NFT, no fosfomycin treatment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Fosfomycin for osteomyelitis?
Scott J Hackett, et al.
ADC Online, 17 Jul 2003 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs