Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2003;88:467-471; doi:10.1136/adc.88.6.467
Copyright © 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2003;88:467-471
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Health effects of family size: cross sectional survey in Chinese adolescents

T Hesketh1, J D Qu2, A Tomkins1

1 Centre for International Child Health, Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK
2 Institute for Population Studies, Zhejiang Medical University, China

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr T Hesketh, UCL-China Reproductive Health Project, 51A Narada Gardens, Wen Yi Road, Hangzhou 310012, PR China; hesketh{at}mail.hz.zj.cn

Aims: To determine whether only children differ in terms of morbidity, nutritional status, risk behaviours, and utilisation of health services from children with siblings, in China.

Methods: A cross sectional survey was carried out using self completion questionnaires, anthropometry, and haemoglobin measurement in middle schools (predominant age 12–16 years) in three distinct socioeconomic areas of Zhejiang province, eastern China.

Results: Data were obtained for 4197 participants. No significant differences were found between only children and those with siblings for some key indicators: underweight 19% v 18%, suicide ideation 14% v 14%, and ever smoking 17% v 15%. Only children were more likely to be overweight (4.8% v 1.5%), and to have attended a doctor (71% v 63%) or dentist (17% v 10%) in the past year. Sibling children are significantly more likely to be anaemic (42% v 32%) and to admit to depression (41% v 21%) or anxiety (45% v 37%). However, after adjusting for area, sex, and parental education levels only two differences remained: sibling children are more likely to be bullied (OR 1.5, 1.1–2.0; p = 0.006) and are less likely to confide in parents (OR 0.6, 0.3–0.8, p = 0.009). There were no significant differences in the key parameters between first and second born children.

Conclusions: We found no detrimental effects of being an only child using the indicators measured. Being an only child may confer some benefits, particularly in terms of socialisation.

Keywords: adolescence; one child policy; morbidity; nutritional status; socioeconomic status


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Atoms
Harvey Marcovitch
Arch. Dis. Child. 2003 88: 463. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Festini, F, de Martino, M (2004). Twenty five years of the one child family policy in China. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58: 358-360 [Full Text]  
  • (2003). Minerva. BMJ 327: E247-247 [Full Text]  
  • (2003). Minerva. BMJ 326: 1274-1274 [Full Text]  
  • Zhu, W X (2003). The One Child Family Policy. Arch. Dis. Child. 88: 463-464 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs