© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Health effects of family size: cross sectional survey in Chinese adolescents
1 Centre for International Child Health, Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK
2 Institute for Population Studies, Zhejiang Medical University, China
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr T Hesketh, UCL-China Reproductive Health Project, 51A Narada Gardens, Wen Yi Road, Hangzhou 310012, PR China; hesketh{at}mail.hz.zj.cn
Aims: To determine whether only children differ in terms of morbidity, nutritional status, risk behaviours, and utilisation of health services from children with siblings, in China.
Methods: A cross sectional survey was carried out using self completion questionnaires, anthropometry, and haemoglobin measurement in middle schools (predominant age 1216 years) in three distinct socioeconomic areas of Zhejiang province, eastern China.
Results: Data were obtained for 4197 participants. No significant differences were found between only children and those with siblings for some key indicators: underweight 19% v 18%, suicide ideation 14% v 14%, and ever smoking 17% v 15%. Only children were more likely to be overweight (4.8% v 1.5%), and to have attended a doctor (71% v 63%) or dentist (17% v 10%) in the past year. Sibling children are significantly more likely to be anaemic (42% v 32%) and to admit to depression (41% v 21%) or anxiety (45% v 37%). However, after adjusting for area, sex, and parental education levels only two differences remained: sibling children are more likely to be bullied (OR 1.5, 1.12.0; p = 0.006) and are less likely to confide in parents (OR 0.6, 0.30.8, p = 0.009). There were no significant differences in the key parameters between first and second born children.
Conclusions: We found no detrimental effects of being an only child using the indicators measured. Being an only child may confer some benefits, particularly in terms of socialisation.
Keywords: adolescence; one child policy; morbidity; nutritional status; socioeconomic status
Relevant Article
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Arch. Dis. Child. 2003 88: 463.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Festini, F, de Martino, M
(2004). Twenty five years of the one child family policy in China. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
58: 358-360
[Full Text] -
(2003). Minerva. BMJ
327: E247-247
[Full Text] -
(2003). Minerva. BMJ
326: 1274-1274
[Full Text] -
Zhu, W X
(2003). The One Child Family Policy. Arch. Dis. Child.
88: 463-464
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



