Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2002;87:371-375; doi:10.1136/adc.87.5.371
Copyright © 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2002;87:371-375
© 2002 Archives of Disease in Childhood

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Randomised controlled trial comparing an acute paediatric hospital at home scheme with conventional hospital care

S A Sartain1, M J Maxwell2, P J Todd3, K H Jones4, A Bagust5, A Haycox6, P Bundred7

1 Researcher, Wirral Services for Child Health
2 Head of the Clinical Practice Research Unit and Consultant in Public Health Medicine, Wirral Hospital NHS Trust
3 Consultant Paediatrician, Wirral Hospital NHS Trust
4 Team Leader, Paediatric Hospital at Home Team, Wirral Hospital NHS Trust
5 Senior Research Fellow, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool
6 Senior Research Fellow, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool
7 Reader in Primary Care, Department of Primary Care, University of Liverpool

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M J Maxwell, Head of CPRU, Arrowe Park Hospital, Upton, Wirral CH49 5PE, UK;
sam.sartain{at}whnt.nhs.uk

Aims: To assess the clinical effectiveness of a paediatric hospital at home service compared to conventional hospital care.

Methods: A total of 399 children suffering from breathing difficulty (n = 202), diarrhoea and vomiting (n = 125), or fever (n = 72) were randomised to Hospital at Home or in-patient paediatric care. Main outcome measures were: comparative clinical effectiveness as measured by readmission rate within three months (used as a proxy for parental coping with illness); and length of stay/care and comparative satisfaction of both patients and carers.

Results: Clinical effectiveness of both services was not significantly different. Length of care was one day longer in the Hospital at Home group; however, most parents and children preferred home care.

Conclusions: Hospital at Home is a clinically acceptable form of care for these groups of acute paediatric illness. Readmission rates within three months failed to show any advantage in terms of parental coping. Parents and patients expressed a strong preference for hospital at home.

Keywords: clinical effectiveness; hospital at home; randomised controlled trial

Abbreviations: HAH, hospital at home; HC, hospital care; RCT, randomised controlled trial


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ni Bhrolchain, C M (2004). Who should provide primary care for children?. Arch. Dis. Child. 89: 116-117 [Full Text]  
  • Pontin, D. (2003). Number of readmissions was similar for hospital at home and traditional hospital care for children with moderate illness. Evid. Based Nurs. 6: 73-73 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs