ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Growth reference charts for use in the United Kingdom

C M Wright¹, I W Booth², J M H Buckler³, N Cameron⁴, T J Cole⁵, M J R Healy⁶, J A Hulse⁷, M A Preece⁵, J J Reilly⁸, A F Williams⁹

¹ University of Newcastle upon Tyne
² Chairman of RCPCH standing Nutrition Committee
³ University of Leeds
⁴ Loughborough University
⁵ Institute of Child Health, London
⁶ Emeritus Professor, LSHTM
⁷ BAPEM
⁸ University of Glasgow
⁹ St George's Medical School, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr C M Wright, Department of Child Health, Glasgow University, PEACH Unit, QMH Tower, Yorkhill Hospitals, Glasgow G3 8SJ, UK;
charlotte.wright{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk

Since the introduction of new growth charts in the mid 1990s, there has been confusion about which charts should be used, with many districts using more than one version. Because of this uncertainty, an expert working party, the Growth Reference Review Group, was convened by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health to provide guidance on the validity and comparability of the different charts currently in use. This paper describes the technical background to the construction and evaluation of growth charts and outlines the group's findings on the validity of each growth reference in relation to contemporary British children. The group concluded that for most clinical purposes the UK90 reference is superior and for many measures is the only usable reference that can be recommended, while the original Tanner–Whitehouse and the Gairdner–Pearson charts are no longer reliable for use at any age. After the age of 2 the revised Buckler–Tanner references are still suitable for assessing height. There are presently no reliable head circumference reference charts for use beyond infancy. The group propose that apart from refinements of chart design and layout, the new UK90 reference should now be "frozen", with any future revisions only undertaken after careful planning and widespread consultation

Keywords: growth; reference chart

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BT, Buckler-Tanner; GP, Gairdner-Pearson; RCPCH, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health; TW, Tanner-Whitehouse

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Spence, D., Alderdice, F. A, Stewart, M. C, Halliday, H. L, Bell, A. H (2007). Does intrauterine growth restriction affect quality of life in adulthood?. Arch. Dis. Child. 92: 700-703 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Onyango, A. W., de Onis, M., Caroli, M., Shah, U., Sguassero, Y., Redondo, N., Carroli, B. (2007). Field-Testing the WHO Child Growth Standards in Four Countries. J. Nutr. 137: 149-152 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Audi, L., Esteban, C., Carrascosa, A., Espadero, R., Perez-Arroyo, A., Arjona, R., Clemente, M., Wollmann, H., Fryklund, L., Parodi, L. A., and the Spanish SGA Study Group, (2006). Exon 3-Deleted/Full-Length Growth Hormone Receptor Polymorphism Genotype Frequencies in Spanish Short Small-for-Gestational-Age (SGA) Children and Adolescents (n = 247) and in an Adult Control Population (n = 289) Show Increased fl/fl in Short SGA. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 91: 5038-5043 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wright, C. M (2005). Growth charts for babies. BMJ 330: 1399-1400 [Full Text]  
• Wright, C M, Parkinson, K N (2004). Postnatal weight loss in term infants: what is "normal" and do growth charts allow for it?. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 89: F254-F257 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gleeson, H. K., Stoeter, R., Ogilvy-Stuart, A. L., Gattamaneni, H. R., Brennan, B. M., Shalet, S. M. (2003). Improvements in Final Height Over 25 Years in Growth Hormone (GH)-Deficient Childhood Survivors of Brain Tumors Receiving GH Replacement. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 88: 3682-3689 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Armstrong, J, Dorosty, A R, Reilly, J J, Child Health Information Team, , Emmett, P M (2003). Coexistence of social inequalities in undernutrition and obesity in preschool children: population based cross sectional study. Arch. Dis. Child. 88: 671-675 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wraith, P (2002). Growth charts for height and weight--statement. Arch. Dis. Child. 87: 563-563 [Full Text]  
• Roberts, E, Hampshire, D J, Pattison, L, Springell, K, Jafri, H, Corry, P, Mannon, J, Rashid, Y, Crow, Y, Bond, J, Woods, C G (2002). Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly: an analysis of locus heterogeneity and phenotypic variation. J. Med. Genet. 39: 718-721 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Reilly, J J, Wilson, M L, Summerbell, C D, Wilson, D C (2002). Obesity: diagnosis, prevention, and treatment; evidence based answers to common questions. Arch. Dis. Child. 86: 392-394 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Growth charts

Tam Fry

ADC Online, 30 Jan 2002 [Full text]

Growth reference charts for use in the United Kingdom

Roberto J Rona, et al.

ADC Online, 4 Feb 2002 [Full text]