Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2001;84:476-479; doi:10.1136/adc.84.6.476
Copyright © 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Arch Dis Child 2001;84:476-479 ( June )

Article

Coverage of neonatal screening: failure of coverage or failure of information system A E Adesa, J Walkera, R Jonesb, I Smithc

a Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford St, London WC1N 1EH, UK, b Department of Biochemistry, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK, c Department of Metabolic Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust

Correspondence to: Dr Ades, MRC Health Services Research Collaboration, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK t.ades{at}bristol.ac.uk

Accepted 9 January 2001

OBJECTIVES---To evaluate neonatal screening coverage using data routinely collected on the laboratory computer.
SUBJECTS---90 850 births in 14 North East Thames community provider districts over a 21 month period.
METHODS---Births notified to local child health computers are electronically copied to the neonatal laboratory computer system, and incoming Guthrie cards are matched against these birth records before testing. The computer records for the study period were processed to estimate the coverage of the screening programme.
RESULTS---Out of an estimated 90 850 births notified to child health computers, all but 746 (0.82%) appeared to have been screened or could be otherwise accounted for (0.14% in non-metropolitan districts, 0.39% in suburban districts, and 1.68% in inner city districts). A further 893 resident infants had been tested, but could not be matched to the list of notified resident births. The calculated programme coverage already exceeds the 99.5% National Audit Programme standard in 7/14 districts. Elsewhere it is not clear whether it is coverage or recording of coverage that is low.
CONCLUSION---Previous reports of low coverage may have been exaggerated. High coverage can be shown using routine information systems. Design of information systems that deliver accurate measures of coverage would be more useful than comparison of inadequately measured coverage with a national standard. The new NHS number project will create an opportunity to achieve this.


Key messages

  • Coverage of neonatal screening is higher than recent reports suggest, but it is difficult to distinguish failure to screen from failure to record screening
  • Coverage of neonatal screening must be monitored accurately both for clinical and public health reasons
  • The new system for issuing NHS numbers at birth will provide a basis for a reliable information system of neonatal screening
  • A national network encompassing neonatal laboratories and maternity and child health computers is needed to ensure that testing is carried out and the results recorded, regardless of where the parents are living, where the sample is taken, and where the tests are carried out




Keywords: screening; births; information systems; coverage

© 2001 by Archives of Disease in Childhood
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article


Arch. Dis. Child. 2001 84: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hardelid, P, Cortina-Borja, M, Williams, D, Tookey, P A, Peckham, C S, Cubitt, W D, Dezateux, C (2009). Rubella seroprevalence in pregnant women in North Thames: estimates based on newborn screening samples. J Med Screen 16: 1-6 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Khalid, J M, Oerton, J, Cortina-Borja, M, Andresen, B S, Besley, G, Dalton, R N, Downing, M, Green, A, Henderson, M, Leonard, J, Dezateux, C, on behalf of the UK Collaborative Study of Newborn, (2008). Ethnicity of children with homozygous c.985A>G medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency: findings from screening approximately 1.1 million newborn infants. J Med Screen 15: 112-117 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jones, J H, Mackenzie, J, Croft, G A, Beaton, S, Young, D, Donaldson, M D C (2006). Improvement in screening performance and diagnosis of congenital hypothyroidism in Scotland 1979-2003. Arch. Dis. Child. 91: 680-685 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Coverage of neonatal screening: Failure of coverage of failure of information system
Anne Green
ADC Online, 19 Nov 2001 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Show me all >>