Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood 1999;80:67-68; doi:10.1136/adc.80.1.67
Copyright © 1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Arch Dis Child 1999;80:67-68 ( January )

Four key questions that identify severe disability

Jean Fooks

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK

Correspondence to: Mrs Fooks.


Accepted 7 August 1998

BACKGROUND---Six hundred and four surviving children aged 2 years, who had been entered into a neonatal trial of fresh frozen plasma on the incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage, were grouped into four categories of disability based on a review by a full paediatric assessment. A 29 item questionnaire completed by the children's health visitors was used to group the children into the same categories.
AIMS---To explore whether severe disability could be identified by using only a few of the 29 questions.
METHOD---The sensitivity and specificity of individual questions were used first to find the subset of questions that best identified children with severe disability. The efficacy of the four most useful questions was tested in a separate cohort of 105 children for whom health visitors had completed questionnaires at the age of 2 years, and who had similarly been assessed by a paediatrician.
RESULTS---In the original trial cohort, the four questions correctly identified 56 of the 61 children with the most severe disabilities as assessed by the paediatrician, and seven children were falsely identified as being severely disabled. In the second cohort, the four questions correctly identified six of the seven children classified as severely disabled by the paediatrician, with no false positives.
CONCLUSION---If four such questions were included in routine child information systems at age 2 years, it might be possible to obtain useful data on the prevalence of severe disability in children.

Keywords: disability; outcome; questionnaire


© 1999 by Archives of Disease in Childhood

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • O'Connor, A R, Stephenson, T J, Johnson, A, Wright, S D, Tobin, M J, Ratib, S, Fielder, A R (2004). A comparison of findings on parents' and teachers' questionnaires, and detailed ophthalmic and psychological assessments. Arch. Dis. Child. 89: 831-835 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs