Evaluation of a national surveillance unit
a The Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit,
and the University of Sydney, Australia, b Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Royal
Alexandra Hospital for Children, Sydney, Australia, c Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of
Sydney, d South Western Sydney
Public Health Unit, Sydney, Australia, e Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services,
Canberra, Australia, f Clinical Epidemiology
and Biostatistics Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne,
Australia, g Department of Paediatrics, Royal
Darwin Hospital, Australia
Correspondence to: Dr E Elliott, The Australia Paediatric Surveillance Unit, PO Box 3515, Parramatta 2124, NSW, Australia. email: apsu{at}nch.edu.au
Accepted 7 July 1998
AIM
The Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit
(APSU) facilitates national active surveillance of uncommon childhood
conditions. This study assessed whether it fulfilled its objectives and
satisfied criteria established by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) for evaluating surveillance systems.
METHODS
Anonymous questionnaires were sent to
users of the system, individual studies were reviewed, and data were
collected from independent sources.
RESULTS
Seven hundred and sixty six clinicians, 48 investigators, and 15 public health professionals responded to the
questionnaires. Clinicians reported that the APSU was useful, 33%
saying information provided by the APSU informed or changed their
clinical practice. Most (88%) reported that completing monthly report
cards was not a burden. Impact on policy development was limited by
suboptimal dissemination of information to public health professionals.
Flexibility and timeliness were limited by design. Estimated
sensitivity of APSU studies ranged from 92% (congenital rubella) to
31% (drowning/near drowning). Positive predictive value of notified
cases was over 70% for most studies.
CONCLUSION
The APSU fulfils most of its objectives
and meets CDC criteria salient to these. Ways in which the APSU could
be improved have been identified, as have methodological challenges and
limitations in applying CDC guidelines to this type of unit.
© 1999 by Archives of Disease in Childhood
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Laurvick, C. L., Msall, M. E., Silburn, S., Bower, C., Klerk, N. d., Leonard, H.
(2006). Physical and Mental Health of Mothers Caring for a Child With Rett Syndrome. Pediatrics
118: e1152-e1164
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Misra, T, Dattani, N, Majeed, A
(2005). Evaluation of the National Congenital Anomaly System in England and Wales. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
90: F368-F373
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Twiss, J, Metcalfe, R, Edwards, E, Byrnes, C
(2005). New Zealand national incidence of bronchiectasis "too high" for a developed country. Arch. Dis. Child.
90: 737-740
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Sibert, J R, Morgan, R J H, O'Connell, H I, Lynn, R, Guildea, Z E, Palmer, S R, group, t. W. P. S.-W. s.
(2001). Short report: Is regional paediatric surveillance useful? Experience in Wales. Arch. Dis. Child.
84: 486-487
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



