Accuracy and reproducibility of low dose insulin administration using pen-injectors and syringes
a Department of
Paediatrics, Booth Hall Children's Hospital, Charlestown Road,
Blackley, Manchester M9 2AA, UK, b Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Booth
Hall Children's Hospital
Correspondence to: Dr Smith.
Accepted 3
February 1998
Many children with diabetes require small doses of insulin
administered with syringes or pen-injector devices (at the Booth Hall
Paediatric Diabetic Clinic, 20% of children aged 0-5 years receive
1-2 U insulin doses). To determine how accurately and reproducibly
small doses are delivered, 1, 2, 5, and 10 U doses of soluble insulin
(100 U/ml) were dispensed in random order 15 times from five new
NovoPens (1.5 ml), five BD-Pens (1.5 ml), and by five nurses using
30 U syringes. Each dose was weighed, and intended and actual doses
compared. The two pen-injectors delivered less insulin than syringes,
differences being inversely proportional to dose. For 1 U (mean (SD)):
0.89 (0.04) U (NovoPen), 0.92 (0.03) U (BD-Pen), 1.23 (0.09) U
(syringe); and for 10 U: 9.8 (0.1) U (NovoPen), 9.9 (0.1) U
(BD-Pen), 10.1 (0.1) U (syringe). The accuracy (percentage errors) of
the pen-injectors was similar and more accurate than syringes
delivering 1, 2, and 5 U of insulin. Errors for 1 U: 11(4)%
(NovoPen), 8(3)% (BD-Pen), 23(9)% (syringe). The reproducibility
(coefficient of variation) of actual doses was similar (< 7%) for
all three devices, which were equally consistent at underdosing
(pen-injectors) or overdosing (syringes) insulin. All three devices,
especially syringes, are unacceptably inaccurate when delivering 1 U
doses of insulin. Patients on low doses need to be educated that their
dose may alter when they transfer from one device to another.
|
Key messages
|
© 1998 by Archives of Disease in Childhood
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Ignaut, D. A., Schwartz, S. L., Sarwat, S., Murphy, H. L.
(2009). Comparative Device Assessments: Humalog KwikPen Compared With Vial and Syringe and FlexPen. The Diabetes Educator
35: 789-798
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Wojciechowski, K. G., Avram, M. J., Raikoff, K., McCarthy, R. J., Wong, C. A.
(2009). A Comparison of Epinephrine Concentrations in Local Anesthetic Solutions Using a "Wash" Versus Measured Technique. Anesth. Analg.
108: 1243-1245
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Spollett, G.
(2008). Insulin Devices: Addressing Barriers to Insulin Therapy With the Ideal Pen. The Diabetes Educator
34: 957-967
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Meece, J.
(2008). Effect of insulin pen devices on the management of diabetes mellitus. Am J Health Syst Pharm
65: 1076-1082
[Full Text] -
Erstad, A. J., Erstad, B. L., Nix, D. E.
(2006). Accuracy and reproducibility of small-volume injections from various-sized syringes. Am J Health Syst Pharm
63: 748-750
[Full Text] -
Keith, K., Nicholson, D., Rogers, D.
(2004). Accuracy and Precision of Low-Dose Insulin Administration Using Syringes, Pen Injectors, and a Pump. CLIN PEDIATR
43: 69-74
[Abstract] -
Robertson, K. E., Glazer, N. B., Campbell, R. K.
(2000). The Latest Developments in Insulin Injection Devices. The Diabetes Educator
26: 135-152
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



