Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood 1998;78:301-311; doi:10.1136/adc.78.4.301
Copyright © 1998 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Arch Dis Child 1998;78:301-311 ( April )

Systematic review of the school entry medical examination

Jane Barlow, Sarah Stewart-Brown, John Fletcher

Health Services Research Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford University, Old Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF

Correspondence to: Dr Barlow.


Accepted 1 October 1997

AIMS---To summarise and critically evaluate research conducted in the UK between 1962 and 1996, on the effectiveness and efficiency of the school entry medical (SEM) examination.
METHODS---An electronic search of a large number of databases, in conjunction with a search of reference lists, and sources in the grey literature produced a total of 64 studies.
RESULTS---Only one overview and 16 primary studies met the review's broad inclusion criteria. The results showed significant differences in the identification and referral of new and ongoing problems not only between the routine and selective SEM but also within the two types of SEM examination. There were also large differences in the numbers of children selected for SEM examination. No study included in the review defined either the methods or the criteria used to identify children as screen positive. No study provided follow up of children after referral to estimate the positive predictive value or yield of the screening, or follow up of the whole cohort to identify false negative cases.
CONCLUSION---Data on the effectiveness and efficiency of both the routine and selective SEM examination in accurately identifying children with new or ongoing health problems are not available at the present time. The studies reviewed here demonstrate the fragility of the evidence on which the school entry medical is based, and call into question the ethical basis of this programme.

Key messages

  • A systematic review of the UK literature from 1962 to date assessed the efficiency and effectiveness of the routine school entry medical (SEM) examination compared with the selective SEM

  • There were significant differences in the identification and referral of new and ongoing problems not only between the routine and selective SEM but also within the two types of SEM

  • There is insufficient evidence available to assess the effectiveness or efficiency of either the routine or selective SEM

  • This review demonstrates the fragility of the evidence on which the SEM is based, and questions the ethical basis of this programme




Keywords: systematic review; selective school entry medical examination; screening


© 1998 by Archives of Disease in Childhood

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Moyer, V. A., Butler, M. (2004). Gaps in the Evidence for Well-Child Care: A Challenge to Our Profession. Pediatrics 114: 1511-1521 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Clemens, C., Doolittle, R. P., Hoyle, M. (2002). Kindergarten Health Assessment Reports: What Do Schools Really Learn from Them?. CLIN PEDIATR 41: 93-98 [Abstract]  
  • RAHI, J S, WILLIAMS, C, BEDFORD, H, ELLIMAN, D (2001). Screening and surveillance for ophthalmic disorders and visual deficits in children in the United Kingdom. Br J Ophthalmol 85: 257-260 [Full Text]  
  • LEFF, S. (1999). Systematic review of the school entry medical examination. Arch. Dis. Child. 80: 100c-100 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs