Usefulness of antinuclear antibody testing to screen for rheumatic diseases
a Division of Rheumatology, Department of
Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, b British Columbia's Children's Hospital
Correspondence to: and reprint requests to: Dr P N Malleson, Room 1A 16, British Columbia's Children's Hospital, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada.
Accepted 16 June 1997
OBJECTIVE
To assess the usefulness of the
indirect immunofluorescence antinuclear antibody test (FANA) using
human laryngeal epithelial carcinoma cells as nuclear substrate, to
screen for childhood rheumatic diseases.
STUDY DESIGN
A review of all FANA tests performed
on children at British Columbia's Children's Hospital between 7 March
1991 and 31 July 1995.
RESULTS
FANA tests were positive at titres of
1:20 or greater in 41% of all subjects tested, and in 65% of all
subjects in whom the diagnosis was obtained. FANA positivity occurred
in 67% of those with a rheumatic disease, compared with 64% of those
with a non-rheumatic disease (p=0.4). More girls had high titre FANA
positivity than boys independent of whether or not they had a rheumatic
disease (p=0.05). At a screening serum dilution of 1:40 a positive test has a sensitivity of only 0.63, and a positive predictive value of only
0.33 for any rheumatic disease. For systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE),
mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), or overlap syndrome at a
screening dilution of 1:40 the test has a very high sensitivity of
0.98, but a very low positive predictive value of only 0.10, the test
having slightly better characteristics for boys than girls.
CONCLUSION
Although a negative FANA test makes a
diagnosis of SLE or MCTD extremely unlikely, a positive test even at
moderately high titres of 1:160 or higher is found so frequently in
children without a rheumatic disease that a positive result has little
or no diagnostic value. It is suggested that a screening serum dilution
of 1:160 or 1:320 would increase the usefulness of the test, by
decreasing false positive tests, without significantly increasing false
negative tests for SLE or MCTD, and would have the potential for
considerable cost savings.
|
Key messages
|
© 1997 by Archives of Disease in Childhood
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Nelson, S. M., Greer, I. A.
(2009). Reply to Heparin's 'potential to improve pregnancy rates and outcomes' is not evidence-based. Hum Reprod Update
0: dmp043v1-dmp043
[Full Text] -
NORDAL, E. B., SONGSTAD, N. T., BERNTSON, L., MOEN, T., STRAUME, B., RYGG, M.
(2009). Biomarkers of Chronic Uveitis in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Predictive Value of Antihistone Antibodies and Antinuclear Antibodies. The Journal of Rheumatology
36: 1737-1743
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Zulian, F, Pluchinotta, F., Martini, G, Da Dalt, L, Zacchello, G
(2008). Severe clinical course of systemic lupus erythematosus in the first year of life. Lupus
17: 780-786
[Abstract] -
Gottlieb, B. S., Ilowite, N. T.
(2006). Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Children and Adolescents.. Pediatr. Rev.
27: 323-330
[Full Text] -
Cimaz, R
(2004). Any increased risk of autoimmune disease?. Lupus
13: 736-739
[Abstract] -
Siegel, D. M.
(2003). Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Testing. Pediatr. Rev.
24: 320-321
[Full Text] -
McGhee, J. L., Burks, F. N., Sheckels, J. L., Jarvis, J. N.
(2002). Identifying Children With Chronic Arthritis Based on Chief Complaints: Absence of Predictive Value for Musculoskeletal Pain as an Indicator of Rheumatic Disease in Children. Pediatrics
110: 354-359
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Malleson, P. N., Beauchamp, R. D.
(2001). Rheumatology: 16. Diagnosing musculoskeletal pain in children. CMAJ
165: 183-188
[Full Text] -
Thomson, K F, Murphy, A, Goodfield, M J D, Misbah, S A
(2001). Is it useful to test for antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens in the presence of a negative antinuclear antibody on Hep-2 cells?. J. Clin. Pathol.
54: 413-413
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



